翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Matthew's Days ・ Matthew's Ridge ・ Matthew, Count of Boulogne ・ Matthew, Count of Foix ・ Matthew, Mark, Luke and John ・ Matthewdavid ・ Matthews ・ Matthews (Middlesex cricketer) ・ Matthews (surname) ・ Matthews Arena ・ Matthews baronets ・ Matthews Batswadi ・ Matthews Beach Park ・ Matthews Beach, Seattle ・ Matthews Commercial Historic District ・ Matthews correlation coefficient ・ Matthews Cove ・ Matthews Fulling Mill Site ・ Matthews Glacier ・ Matthews Hall ・ Matthews Hall (Colorado) ・ Matthews Hall (Tempe, Arizona) ・ Matthews House ・ Matthews Island ・ Matthews Kambale ・ Matthews Kempson ・ Matthews Motshwarateu ・ Matthews Peak ・ Matthews Place ・ Matthews Point Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Matthews correlation coefficient ： ウィキペディア英語版 Matthews correlation coefficient The Matthews correlation coefficient is used in machine learning as a measure of the quality of binary (two-class) classifications, introduced by biochemist Brian W. Matthews in 1975. It takes into account true and false positives and negatives and is generally regarded as a balanced measure which can be used even if the classes are of very different sizes. The MCC is in essence a correlation coefficient between the observed and predicted binary classifications; it returns a value between −1 and +1. A coefficient of +1 represents a perfect prediction, 0 no better than random prediction and −1 indicates total disagreement between prediction and observation. The statistic is also known as the phi coefficient. MCC is related to the chi-square statistic for a 2×2 contingency table : $|\backslash text|\; =\; \backslash sqrt\}$ where ''n'' is the total number of observations. While there is no perfect way of describing the confusion matrix of true and false positives and negatives by a single number, the Matthews correlation coefficient is generally regarded as being one of the best such measures.〔 Other measures, such as the proportion of correct predictions (also termed accuracy), are not useful when the two classes are of very different sizes. For example, assigning every object to the larger set achieves a high proportion of correct predictions, but is not generally a useful classification. The MCC can be calculated directly from the confusion matrix using the formula: : $$ \text = \frac In this equation, ''TP'' is the number of true positives, ''TN'' the number of true negatives, ''FP'' the number of false positives and ''FN'' the number of false negatives. If any of the four sums in the denominator is zero, the denominator can be arbitrarily set to one; this results in a Matthews correlation coefficient of zero, which can be shown to be the correct limiting value. The original formula as given by Matthews was:〔 : $$ \text = TN + TP + FN + FP : $$ \text = \frac : $$ \text = \frac : $$ \text = \frac This is equal to the formula given above. As a correlation coefficient, the Matthews correlation coefficient is the geometric mean of the regression coefficients of the problem and its dual. The component regression coefficients of the Matthews correlation coefficient are Markedness (deltap) and Youden's J statistic (Informedness or deltap'). Markedness and Informedness correspond to different directions of information flow and generalize Youden's J statistic, the deltap statistics and (as their geometric mean) the Matthews Correlation Coefficient to more than two classes.〔 == Confusion Matrix == (詳細はspecificity (SPC) or True Negative Rate :$\backslash mathit\; =\; \backslash mathit\; /\; N\; =\; \backslash mathit\; /\; (\backslash mathit\; +\; \backslash mathit)$ ; precision or positive predictive value (PPV) :$\backslash mathit\; =\; \backslash mathit\; /\; (\backslash mathit\; +\; \backslash mathit)$ ; negative predictive value (NPV) :$\backslash mathit\; =\; \backslash mathit\; /\; (\backslash mathit\; +\; \backslash mathit)$ ; fall-out or false positive rate (FPR) :$\backslash mathit\; =\; \backslash mathit\; /\; N\; =\; \backslash mathit\; /\; (\backslash mathit\; +\; \backslash mathit)$ ; false discovery rate (FDR) :$\backslash mathit\; =\; \backslash mathit\; /\; (\backslash mathit\; +\; \backslash mathit)\; =\; 1\; -\; \backslash mathit$ ; Miss Rate or False Negative Rate (FNR) :$\backslash mathit\; =\; \backslash mathit\; /\; (\backslash mathit\; +\; \backslash mathit)$ ---- ; accuracy (ACC) :$\backslash mathit\; =\; (\backslash mathit\; +\; \backslash mathit)\; /\; (P\; +\; N)$ ;F1 score : is the harmonic mean of precision and sensitivity :$\backslash mathit\; =\; 2\; \backslash mathit\; /\; (2\; \backslash mathit\; +\; \backslash mathit\; +\; \backslash mathit)$ ; Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) :$\backslash frac$ ;Informedness :$TPR\; +\; SPC\; -\; 1$ ;Markedness :$PPV\; +\; NPV\; -\; 1$ ; ''Sources: Fawcett (2006) and Powers (2011).''〔 |} Let us define an experiment from P positive instances and N negative instances for some condition. The four outcomes can be formulated in a 2×2 ''contingency table'' or ''confusion matrix'', as follows: 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Matthews correlation coefficient」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.